Lecture delivered to the delegates at the LIC Ernakulam.
The concept of Multiple Intelligence
The theory of multiple intelligences was proposed by Howard Gardner in 1983 as a model of intelligence that differentiates intelligence into various specific (primarily sensory) modalities rather than seeing it as dominated by a single general ability.
Gardner argues that
there is a wide range of cognitive abilities and that there are only very weak
correlations among them. For example, the theory predicts that a child who
learns to multiply easily is not necessarily generally more intelligent than a
child who has more difficulty on this task. The child who takes more time to
master simple multiplication 1) may best learn to multiply through a different
approach, 2) may excel in a field outside of mathematics, or 3) may even be
looking at and understanding the multiplication process at a fundamentally deeper
level, or perhaps as an entirely different process. The theory has been met
with mixed responses. Traditional intelligence tests and psychometrics
have generally found high correlations between different tasks and aspects of
intelligence rather than the low correlations which Gardner's theory predicts.
Nevertheless many educationalists support the practical value of the approaches
suggested by the theory.
The concept of Multiple Intelligence
The theory of multiple intelligences was proposed by Howard Gardner in 1983 as a model of intelligence that differentiates intelligence into various specific (primarily sensory) modalities rather than seeing it as dominated by a single general ability.
Gardner argues that
there is a wide range of cognitive abilities and that there are only very weak
correlations among them. For example, the theory predicts that a child who
learns to multiply easily is not necessarily generally more intelligent than a
child who has more difficulty on this task. The child who takes more time to
master simple multiplication 1) may best learn to multiply through a different
approach, 2) may excel in a field outside of mathematics, or 3) may even be
looking at and understanding the multiplication process at a fundamentally deeper
level, or perhaps as an entirely different process. The theory has been met
with mixed responses. Traditional intelligence tests and psychometrics
have generally found high correlations between different tasks and aspects of
intelligence rather than the low correlations which Gardner's theory predicts.
Nevertheless many educationalists support the practical value of the approaches
suggested by the theory.
Gardner articulated several criteria for a behaviour to be
identified as intelligence. He took into consideration the following aspects
which influence the total ability of a person.
a.
Potential
for brain isolation by brain damage
b.
Place in
evolutionary history
c.
Presence of
core operations
d.
Susceptibility
to encoding (symbolic expression)
e.
A distinct
developmental progression
f.
The
existence of savants, prodigies and other exceptional people
g.
Support from
experimental psychology and psychometric findings
Gardner believes that eight abilities meet these criteria:
1.
Spatial
2.
Linguistic
3.
Logical-mathematical
4.
Bodily-kinesthetic
5.
Musical
(Auditory)
6.
Interpersonal
7.
Intrapersonal
8.
Naturalistic
1. Spatial
This area deals with
spatial judgment and the ability to visualize with the mind's eye. Careers which
suit those with this type of intelligence include artists, designers
and architects. A spatial person is also good with puzzles. Spatial ability is
one of the three factors beneath g in the hierarchical model of
intelligence.
2. Linguistic
This area has to do
with words, spoken or written. People with high verbal-linguistic intelligence
display a facility with words and languages. They are typically good at
reading, writing, telling stories and memorizing words along with dates. They
tend to learn best by reading, taking notes, listening to lectures, and by
discussing and debating about what they have learned. Those with verbal-linguistic
intelligence learn foreign languages very easily as they have high verbal
memory and recall, and an ability to understand and manipulate syntax and
structure. Verbal ability is one of the most g-loaded abilities.
3. Logical-mathematical
This area has to do
with logic, abstractions, reasoning and numbers and critical thinking. While it
is often assumed that those with this intelligence naturally excel in
mathematics, chess, computer programming and other logical or numerical
activities, a more accurate definition places less emphasis on traditional
mathematical ability and more on reasoning capabilities, recognizing abstract
patterns, scientific thinking and investigation and the ability to perform
complex calculations. Logical reasoning is closely linked to fluid intelligence
and to general ability.
4. Bodily-kinesthetic
The core elements of
the bodily-kinesthetic intelligence are control of one's
bodily motions and the capacity to handle objects skillfully. Gardner
elaborates to say that this intelligence also includes a sense of timing, a
clear sense of the goal of a physical action, along with the ability to train
responses so they become like reflexes.
In theory, people who
have bodily-kinesthetic intelligence should learn better by involving muscular
movement (e.g. getting up and moving around into the learning experience) and
are generally good at physical activities such as sports or dance. They may enjoy
acting or performing and in general are good at building and making things.
They often learn best by doing something physically rather than by reading or
hearing about it. Those with strong bodily-kinesthetic intelligence seem to use
what might be termed muscle memory, drawing on it to supplement or in extreme
cases even substitute for other skills such as verbal memory.
5. Musical (Auditory)
This area has to do
with sensitivity to sounds, rhythms, tones and music. People with a high
musical intelligence normally have good pitch and may even have absolute pitch
and are able to sing, play musical instruments, and compose music. Since there
is a strong auditory component to this intelligence, those who are strongest in
it may learn best via lecture. Language skills are typically highly developed
in those whose base intelligence is musical. In addition they will sometimes
use songs or rhythms to learn. They have sensitivity to rhythm, pitch, meter,
tone, melody or timbre.
Research measuring the
effects of music on second language acquisition is supportive of this
music-language connection. In an investigation conducted on a group of
elementary-aged English language learners, music facilitated their language
learning. Gardner's theory may help to explain why music and its sub-components
(i.e., stress, pitch, rhythm) may be viable vehicles for second language
learning.
6. Interpersonal
This area has to do
with interaction
with others. Interpersonal intelligence is the ability to understand
others. In theory, individuals who have high interpersonal intelligence are
characterized by their sensitivity to others' moods, feelings, temperaments and
motivations, and their ability to cooperate in order to work as part of a
group.
7. Intrapersonal
This area has to do
with introspective
and self-reflective capacities. This refers to having a deep understanding of
the self; what your strengths/ weaknesses are, what makes you unique, being
able to predict your own reactions/emotions. Philosophical and critical
thinking is common with this intelligence.
8. Naturalistic
This area has to do
with nurturing and relating information to one’s natural surroundings. Examples
include classifying natural forms such as animal and plant species and rocks
and mountain types; and the applied knowledge of nature in farming, mining,
etc.
Existential Intelligence
Some proponents of
multiple intelligence theory proposed spiritual or religious intelligence as a
possible additional type. Gardner did not want to commit to a spiritual
intelligence but suggested that an existential intelligence may be a useful
construct. The hypothesis of an existential intelligence has been further
explored by educational researchers.
Existential
intelligence is characterized by the ability to contemplate phenomena or
questions beyond sensory data, such as the infinite and infinitesimal.
Use of Multiple Intelligence in
education
Gardner (1999) defines
an intelligence as ‘bio-psychological potential to process information that can
be activated in a cultural setting to solve problems or create products that
are of value in a culture. According to Gardner, there are more ways to do this
than just through logical and linguistic intelligence. Gardner believes that
the purpose of schooling should be to develop intelligences and to help people
reach vocational and vocational goals that are appropriate to their particular
spectrum of intelligences. People who are helped to do so feel more engaged and
competent and therefore more inclined to serve society in a constructive way.
Traditionally, schools
have emphasized the development of logical intelligence and linguistic
intelligence (mainly reading and writing). IQ tests focus mostly on logical and
linguistic intelligence. Upon doing well on these tests, chances of attending a
prestige college or university increase, which in turn creates contributing
members of society. According to Helding "Standard IQ tests measure
knowledge gained at a particular moment in time, they can only provide a
freeze-frame view of crystallized knowledge. They cannot assess or predict a
person’s ability to learn, to assimilate new information or to solve new
problems. Gardner's theory argues that students will be better served by a
broader vision of education, wherein teachers use different methodologies,
exercises and activities to reach all students, not just those who excel at
linguistic and logical intelligence. It challenges educators to find ways that
will work for this student learning this topic.
Ultimately, it would
certainly be desirable to have an algorithm for the selection of intelligence
such that any trained researcher could determine whether a candidate's
intelligence met the appropriate criteria. At present, however, it must be
admitted that the selection (or rejection) of a candidate's intelligence is
reminiscent more of an artistic judgement than of a scientific assessment.
No comments:
Post a Comment